Police Reform Act 2002

The Todal

2024-09-13 08:35:36 UTC

Post by Nicholas Collin Paul de GlouceÅ¿ter
""Thank you for your email sent to our office on 1 February 2024 in
which you requested a review of your complaint made about the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 3 November 2023.
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) is the relevant review
body for your complaint. [. . .]
[. . .]
I would like to take this opportunity to remind you of MOPAC’s role in
the police complaints process. My role is to ensure that the MPS
complaint handler fully understood and addressed your complaint and that
their findings were logical based on the information and evidence
available.
My role does not extend to reconsidering your complaint, or any
subsequent matters you have raised following the conclusion of the
complaint handling. However, I can recommend that a complaint is
investigated should I identify any issues with the handling of this matter.
[. . .]
• I recommend that this matter is remedied according to paragraph 28ZA,
Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002;"
said Mr. A Broad.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thanks for the above. Acuity Law had recommended a law firm (5PL) for me
to instruct but genocide in Gaza used to deprive that firm de capacity
to represent me. So I telephoned Acuity Law instead yesterday. If
neither de these firms has spare capacity to represent me or if they do
not work in a relevant area de law, then please recommend to me the law
firms that can represent me for paragraph 28ZA, Schedule 3, Police
Reform Act 2002 and that can represent me against wilful misconduct in
public office by police officers and against wilful neglect of duty.
What are the relevant "Area[s] of practice"s in the search engine on
HTTPS://solicitors.LawSociety.org.UK/?Pro=True
?
Today's
MOPAC REVIEW OUTCOME - GLOSTER - PC1037523.pdf
lacks this fact: I sent a warning to Mister PC Caldwell on 06/08/2024.
I republish points de
MOPAC REVIEW OUTCOME - GLOSTER - PC1037523.pdf
via
[. . .]
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/
Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/
mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-
_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages15-16.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/
Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/
mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-
_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages21-23.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/
Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/
mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-
_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages28-29.pdf
I will republish via LinkedIn after a few seconds. (LinkedIn imposes
tiny size limits so LinkedIn republications shall probably be smaller
than this email.)
Yours faithfully,
Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter"
say I myself to MOPAC today.
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Scholastica_or_LinkedIn_connivance/
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/
Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/
mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/
PC_EH_Hills/2023-10-28b_I_see_no_convincing_evidence_that_they_counter_these_murderesses04.png

I don't understand your post but it seems you have a grievance about the
police.

Can you explain it more clearly in case anyone wants to offer an opinion?