Tony Raven
2008-01-26 14:15:05 UTC
There seems to be a lot of confusion about footpaths and footways and
I'm interested in what the difference is in law.
The law cited against pavement cycling (Highway Act 1835 s32) uses the
wording "footpath or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart
for the use or accommodation of foot passengers"
However the Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999 s3(2)b says the FPD
offence is "b) cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the
Highways Act 1835." and the The Police Reform Act 2002 (Standard Powers
and Duties of Community Support Officers) Order 2007 allows CSOs to
enforce "(a) an offence under section 72 of the Highway Act 1835(2)
(riding on a footway) committed by cycling;"
However there are indication elsewhere that a footway is part of the
highway set aside for foot use whereas a footpath is a highway for use
only on foot. e.g. p3 of http://tinyurl.com/2ew8ut
Can anyone clarify the situation. On the one hand the recent
legislation above would indicate that either they are interchangeable or
the parliamentary draughtsmen screwed up whereas other indications would
seem to suggest that most pavements are not footpaths but footways and
therefore not caught by the 1835 Act.
I'm interested in what the difference is in law.
The law cited against pavement cycling (Highway Act 1835 s32) uses the
wording "footpath or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart
for the use or accommodation of foot passengers"
However the Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999 s3(2)b says the FPD
offence is "b) cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the
Highways Act 1835." and the The Police Reform Act 2002 (Standard Powers
and Duties of Community Support Officers) Order 2007 allows CSOs to
enforce "(a) an offence under section 72 of the Highway Act 1835(2)
(riding on a footway) committed by cycling;"
However there are indication elsewhere that a footway is part of the
highway set aside for foot use whereas a footpath is a highway for use
only on foot. e.g. p3 of http://tinyurl.com/2ew8ut
Can anyone clarify the situation. On the one hand the recent
legislation above would indicate that either they are interchangeable or
the parliamentary draughtsmen screwed up whereas other indications would
seem to suggest that most pavements are not footpaths but footways and
therefore not caught by the 1835 Act.
--
Tony
?Thinking you know when in fact you don't is a fatal mistake, to which
we are all prone?
Bertrand Russell
Tony
?Thinking you know when in fact you don't is a fatal mistake, to which
we are all prone?
Bertrand Russell